Do Relic'd Guitars Actually Play or Sound Better? An Honest Take From the Bench
Share
Do Relic'd Guitars Actually Play or Sound Better? An Honest Take From the Bench
Short answer, and I'll say it before you scroll: no. Relic'ing is a finish job. Aging a guitar — the checked lacquer, the worn-through spots, the dinged hardware — is cosmetic work done in a spray booth. It doesn't make a guitar sound better, and it doesn't make one play better. Anything you feel or hear from a good relic comes from things that have nothing to do with the fake wear: how thin the finish is, how the neck was shaped, and how the guitar was set up.
That's not me being a snob about it. I've had plenty of relic'd guitars on the bench and some of them are terrific instruments. I just want you to buy them for the right reasons, because the marketing around aged finishes leans hard on the idea that worn equals better, and that part isn't true.
What "relic" actually means
"Relic" is just the trade word for a factory-aged finish. The big names put a whole program behind it. Fender's Custom Shop grades its aging from NOS (new old stock, basically no wear) through Closet Classic, Journeyman Relic, Relic, and Heavy Relic. Gibson opened the Murphy Lab in 2021 — named for Tom Murphy, the guy who more or less invented modern factory aging — and offers four levels, from Ultra Light to Ultra Heavy. Then there's the aftermarket and DIY world, where a builder or a hobbyist checks the lacquer, sands through the edges, and rusts the hardware to taste.
Every one of those is the same idea: make a new guitar look like it's been gigged for forty years. The build underneath can be excellent (a Murphy Lab Les Paul is a Custom Shop guitar first and an aged guitar second), or it can be a bog-standard instrument with a distressed finish. The aging itself tells you nothing about the guitar's quality.
Does a reliced finish change your tone?
This is where the myth lives. You'll hear that checked, worn nitro "lets the wood breathe" and opens up the tone. Here's the honest version. On a solidbody electric, the finish's effect on tone is small to begin with, and what little effect exists comes from finish thickness, not from wear. A thin nitro coat measures a fraction of a millimeter; a thick poly coat can be several times that, and a heavy finish does damp resonance a measurable but small amount. Aging a finish — cracking it, buffing through it in spots — doesn't meaningfully change how thick it is across the body. The checking is happening in a coat that's already only thousandths of an inch thick.
So could two guitars sound a hair different, one glossy and one relic'd? Sure, but for the same reason any two guitars differ: wood, pickups, setup, the finish thickness they left the factory with. The wear pattern isn't doing it. If tone is your goal, a fresh set of pickups or an honest setup will do more than any amount of distressing. We got into this in more detail in our piece on nitro versus poly finishes, and the conclusion there was the same: it's the application, not the aging.
Does it play better?
A well-done relic often does feel great in the hands — and that fools people into crediting the wear. What you're actually feeling is usually a satin or thinned neck finish and a good setup. A glossy neck can feel sticky to a sweaty hand; a satin or worn-in neck feels fast because there's less to grab. But you don't need a relic for that. A factory satin finish, like the Worn Cherry Studio above, gets you the same slick feel honestly, and it wears in on its own the more you play it. Fret work, nut slots, and action height are what make a guitar play well or badly. None of that is what a relic shop is selling you.
How to tell honest wear from a spray-booth relic
This matters most when you're buying used and a seller is calling something "road worn." Genuine wear follows the hands, and it's asymmetric. It shows up exactly where a body actually contacts a guitar over years, and nowhere else. A relic that was done well imitates this. A lazy one doesn't — it sprays checking evenly across the whole top and dings places a player's arm and pick would never reach.
The five honest tells: the forearm edge buffed thin, pick scratches fanning off the bridge pickup on the treble side, the lower-bout edge rubbed by leg and strap, the back of the neck gone satin under the palm, and dings on the top edge of the headstock from stands and cases. See those, in those spots, with the rest of the guitar comparatively clean? That's a played guitar. See uniform checking across a pristine back and unplayed upper horn? That's a finish effect.
The resale question — this is the real catch
Here's where I'll give you my honest opinion, because this is where relic'ing actually costs you money. A factory relic from a Custom Shop or the Murphy Lab holds its value fine, because the market knows exactly what it is and there's a premium built into it from day one. But an aftermarket or DIY relic on an otherwise standard guitar almost always hurts resale. You've taken an instrument a lot of buyers would want clean and permanently narrowed your audience to the people who happen to like that exact distress job. In my experience, a home relic knocks real money off a standard production guitar, and you can't undo it.
My honest take
If you love the way a relic looks, buy it. There's no shame in wanting a guitar that looks lived-in, and there's a genuine practical upside: when you put the first real ding in it yourself, it won't bother you and it won't dent the value, because the value already accounts for the wear. That's a real reason some working players prefer them.
Just go in clear-eyed. You're paying for looks and, on the high-end stuff, for the artistry of the aging — not for tone and not for playability. If what you actually want is a guitar that feels broken in without the premium, a clean used instrument or a factory satin/faded model gets you 90% of the way there for a lot less. Buy the guitar. Don't pay extra for the wear unless the wear is the whole point for you. You can see what we've got in stock on the used guitars in stock page.
FAQ
Does relic'ing damage the guitar or expose the wood to rot?
Light to moderate checking is purely a finish effect — the crazing happens in the lacquer, and the wood underneath is fine. The only real caution is a heavy DIY job that sands clean through to bare wood in spots; unsealed wood can take on moisture over time. On a competent relic, that's not an issue.
Will a reliced nitro finish keep cracking and wearing faster?
Nitrocellulose checks more readily than poly with temperature swings — that's exactly why it's the finish of choice for relics. It's not structurally weaker in any way that matters; it just continues to age. If you want a finish that stays put, you don't want a relic in the first place.
Is a Gibson Murphy Lab or Fender Custom Shop relic worth the premium?
If you want that guitar, yes — but understand what you're paying for. The premium buys you a Custom Shop build plus the aging craft, which really is impressive up close. The tone and feel come from the build and the setup, not from the aging. You're paying for a great guitar that also happens to look old.
Should I relic my own guitar?
If it's a keeper you'll never sell, and you'll enjoy the look, go for it — it's your guitar. Just know it's close to permanent and it will cost you at resale on anything but a boutique or Custom Shop piece. Never do it to a guitar you might want to move later.